Thursday 27 November 2014

Revenge isn't Justice; The Death Penalty should be abolished in Uganda


By Cynthia Ampairwe 
Fourth year Law student, Makerere University, also an intern at FHRI
Makerere University
 
Today, one of the most debated issues in the Criminal Justice system is the issue of capital punishment or the death penalty. Over the years, a number of countries have abolished the death penalty.  However, Uganda still recognizes its imposition for the most serious offences. It is for this reason that this has become one of the major areas of contention especially in the Human Rights perspective. It is a topic of interest not only to the lawyers but also to the public at large. The article therefore presents the current situation in Uganda as regards the abolition of the death penalty. It presents the major reasons that have been given in support of the death penalty; deterrence and retribution. It goes ahead to show how these arguments have not been effective in other countries as well as Uganda. Conversely, more convincing arguments have been raised for its abolition amongst which is the argument that it is a violation of human rights. The article also presents a brief on Jeremy Bentham’s theory of punishment.  Finally, this article points the way forward. The author argues that publicity and the need for a constitutional review should be the major concerns as we move towards total abolition of the death penalty in Uganda.

INTRODUCTION.

 History shows that the view of every nation regarding the infliction of the death punishment have, in the process of time undergone significant changes. There is a growing trend towards the universal abolition of the death penalty and a restriction in the scope and use of capital punishment over the last fifty years.[1] Of the 198 states in the world, 58 retain the death penalty, 98 are abolitionist for all crimes, 7 are abolitionist for ordinary crimes, and 35 are abolitionist in practice (retaining the death penalty but having not executed anyone during the past 10 years).[2]

The vast majority of countries in Africa have moved away from the death penalty while a small, isolated group continues to cling to state-sanctioned killing. 16 of the member states of the African Union are abolitionist in law. Gabon is the latest country to abolish the death penalty; others include Angola, Burundi, Senegal, Cape Verde, Ivory Coast, Djibouti, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Mozambique, Namibia, Rwanda, Seychelles, South Africa, Togo, and Mauritius.[3]

During the year (2013), many states across Africa took small but significant steps towards abolition. New constitutions were drafted in Ghana and Sierra Leone to end capital punishment, Both Benin and Comoros are considering new penal codes that would abolish the death penalty for all crimes. However, there was still an increase in executions in 2013. Nigeria, Sudan, Somalia were behind more than 90% of the 64 reported executions carried out in Africa in 2013. They are also accounted for two-thirds of all reported death sentences in the region with dramatic increases especially in Nigeria and Somalia.[4]

The Role of Access to Justice in Sustainable Development


Presentation by Mrs. Maria Kaddu Busuulwa,    
Senior Legal Associate,FHRI.
at the East African Academy in Arusha, Tanzania from 4th - 5th 2014

Qtn: How will access to justice in Uganda work towards the attainment of SDGs?
Scope of discussion
·         What is access to justice?
·         What are the Sustainable development goals (SDGs)-summary
·         What should access to justice entail/what should it be in reality and how will it lead towards the development/sustainability of SDGs.
What is access to justice?
Ø  According to United States Institute of Peace, access to justice is more than improving an individual’s access to courts or guaranteeing legal representation. Access to justice is defined as the ability of people to seek and obtain a remedy through formal or informal institutions of justice for grievances in compliance with human rights standards.

What is Sustainable development and/or Sustainable development goals?
Ø  There are many definitions of sustainable development, including this landmark one which first appeared in 1987: — from the World Commission on Environment and Development’s (the Brundtland Commission) report "Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."
Ø  Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) on the other hand refer to an agreement of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development held in Rio de Janeiro in June 2012 (Rio+20), to develop a set of future international development goals. The proposal contains 17 goals with 169 targets covering a broad range of sustainable development issues, including ending poverty and hunger, improving health and education, making cities more sustainable, combating climate change, and protecting oceans and forests.
Ø  Goal 16 talks about access to justice. It seeks to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels